-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Peter da Silva wrote:
| On 2009-03-05, at 07:53, Joshua Juran wrote:
|> On Mar 5, 2009, at 5:43 AM, Peter da Silva wrote:
|>> On 2009-03-05, at 03:34, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
|>>> I used to use it back when I was on Win95. It was the best
|>>> Win32 GUI MUA around, by a margin. (The next best choice was
|>>> Outlook Express...)
|>> Outlook and Outlook Express were so hateful that they were the
|>> only mail software I banned in 20 years as a network
|>> administrator.
|>>
|>> Mail software that required you to carve the recipient's name in
|>> your flesh with a sharpened toothpick would be less hateful.
|
|> That would certainly cure people of accidental reply-to-all.
|
| It might also make them sit up and take notice when their computer
| got infected by an email worm.
|
| Though I might be overly optimistic here.
|

Put a dent in spam too. We might be on to something here.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkmv4IIACgkQyHR/4uWto7/YRACffuKoz6W2K3g2zZwoZ7oxT5m+
l5gAoJDeHFCRJ4IWysz9QPrvsnzmgoL7
=hr31
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to