Ok, i see. And, When you have a minute, Could you please reply to this post?
http://www.nabble.com/Hama-contribution-td16168912.html I approve of their opinion in principle, but hadoop is no answer. On 3/21/08, Jim Kellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With respect to hql, it is not going to be removed for 0.1.0 for a couple of > reasons: > - 0.1.0 is feature frozen to whatever was in Hadoop-0.16.0 > - We do not yet have a replacement for hql nor would we release it with 0.1.0 > > You can be assured hql will be removed before HBase-0.2.0 > > Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: edward yoon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 6:07 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release hbase 0.1.0 (Candidate 0) > > > > -1 > > > > This is a first release of a hbase. > > A hql package should be removed before release. > > > > Someday it will be gone, Do it now. > > > > On 3/21/08, stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've created an hbase 0.1.0 release candidate. Please download and > > > try it out: > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.0-candidate-0/ > > > > > > Does it work for you? Do unit tests pass on your hardware? Is the > > > documentation sufficient? > > > > > > Should we release this? Vote closes on Monday, March 24. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > St.Ack > > > > > > > > > -- > > B. Regards, > > Edward yoon @ NHN, corp. > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG. > > Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1335 - Release > > Date: 3/19/2008 9:54 AM > > > > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG. > Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1335 - Release Date: 3/19/2008 > 9:54 AM > > -- B. Regards, Edward yoon @ NHN, corp.
