[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12642593#action_12642593
]
stack commented on HBASE-953:
-----------------------------
Rong-en: Thanks for the tip. I'll try some loading tests using it. It might
be better with soft references.
With 1.6.0_10, with 8 concurrent clients, random reads completed. Trying again
with single client.. but also thinking on it on way home, smaller blocks make
more sense. I cut it down to 16k as suggested by jgray
> Reevaluate HBASE-288 block caching work; should it be enabled always?
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-953
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-953
> Project: Hadoop HBase
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: stack
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.19.0
>
>
> Go back and take another look at the Tom White work. We've gotten boost in
> writing and scanning because of J-D work. HBASE-288 looks like it boosts
> sequential reads and perhaps random read a little. Take another look.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
