Hi Tom, First the outstanding issues on HBASE-1064 should come to some resolution or consensus. I read recent comments from Brian Beggs that suggest this may be ironed out well enough in time for 0.19.0. Thanks to Brian for that.
Regarding updating REST for a X.X.1 release, in my opinion if both the old and new semantics are preserved as options in that case, it is not an incompatible change. - Andy > From: Tom Nichols <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: HBase 0.19 > To: [email protected], [email protected] > Date: Wednesday, December 31, 2008, 6:41 AM > Fair enough, if you'd be willing to put a new feature in > an x.x.1 release. I just didn't want the REST interface > to get pushed back to a release potentially months away. > > Thanks. > -Tom > > > On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Andrew Purtell > <[email protected]> wrote: > > -1 for HBASE-1064 for 0.19. > > > > +1 for 0.19.1 and/or 0.20.0. > > > > - Andy
