[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12783244#action_12783244
]
Lars Francke commented on HBASE-1744:
-------------------------------------
I'm currently working on this based on your latest patch. At the same time I'm
moving it to contrib (HBASE-1846)
What is the deprecation policy for this? Should I maintain the current API (it
has to be regenerated for a newer version of Thrift) and introduce the new API
as an additional option?
As far as I know there is no option to mark something as deprecated in the
thrift file so the generated code would not mention any deprecation. We'd have
to document/communicate this.
> Thrift server to match the new java api.
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-1744
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1744
> Project: Hadoop HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: thrift
> Reporter: Tim Sell
> Assignee: Tim Sell
> Fix For: 0.21.0
>
> Attachments: thriftexperiment.patch
>
>
> This mutateRows, etc.. is a little confusing compared to the new cleaner java
> client.
> Thinking of ways to make a thrift client that is just as elegant. something
> like:
> void put(1:Bytes table, 2:TPut put) throws (1:IOError io)
> with:
> struct TColumn {
> 1:Bytes family,
> 2:Bytes qualifier,
> 3:i64 timestamp
> }
> struct TPut {
> 1:Bytes row,
> 2:map<TColumn, Bytes> values
> }
> This creates more verbose rpc than if the columns in TPut were just
> map<Bytes, map<Bytes, Bytes>>, but that is harder to fit timestamps into and
> still be intuitive from say python.
> Presumably the goal of a thrift gateway is to be easy first.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
