I'm using a couple of custom filters. I seem to recall a similar initial problem with them being serialized, and it seems like the errors were being swallowed and not making it to the logs (as Stack mentioned). I think it was something silly on my part like a missing default constructor, but can't remember the specifics...
Sorry I can't be any help... -clint On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Przemek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > stack wrote: > > Can you just add static logging to Filter? Especially around > > construction and in the read/write methods used serializing? Hopefully > > will turn up a clue as to whats going on. > > St.Ack > > I had done so before the previous post. That's why I knew only write() > was invoked. I've got even a test for the serialization (similar to the > ones you have in HBase tests) and it works. Same for the constructor. > I'm having hard times with that :( I was testing that on Linux and Win32 > so it has nothing to do with the environment. Is anybody using custom > filters? If I could adapt one of the core filters it would be cool, but > I doubt any of those can meet my requirements. Basically I wanna apply > some expression on each RowResult so I need to be given a RowResult and > decide if I accept that one or not. Of course I need to have that > elimination not on the client side. The thing is I wanna use any column > and eval my own expression (MVEL, OGNL, etc), so ColumnValueFilter is > not suitable here I guess. > > Przemek > > -- > SubRecord - Enterprise Aspects Stack > http://subrecord.org >
