You have a default constructor in your filter? Want to paste code into
an issue and describe how to the manufacture the issue so others can
share your pain?
St.Ack
Clint Morgan wrote:
I'm using a couple of custom filters. I seem to recall a similar initial
problem with them being serialized, and it seems like the errors were being
swallowed and not making it to the logs (as Stack mentioned). I think it was
something silly on my part like a missing default constructor, but can't
remember the specifics...
Sorry I can't be any help...
-clint
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Przemek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
stack wrote:
Can you just add static logging to Filter? Especially around
construction and in the read/write methods used serializing? Hopefully
will turn up a clue as to whats going on.
St.Ack
I had done so before the previous post. That's why I knew only write()
was invoked. I've got even a test for the serialization (similar to the
ones you have in HBase tests) and it works. Same for the constructor.
I'm having hard times with that :( I was testing that on Linux and Win32
so it has nothing to do with the environment. Is anybody using custom
filters? If I could adapt one of the core filters it would be cool, but
I doubt any of those can meet my requirements. Basically I wanna apply
some expression on each RowResult so I need to be given a RowResult and
decide if I accept that one or not. Of course I need to have that
elimination not on the client side. The thing is I wanna use any column
and eval my own expression (MVEL, OGNL, etc), so ColumnValueFilter is
not suitable here I guess.
Przemek
--
SubRecord - Enterprise Aspects Stack
http://subrecord.org
