Andy Would not it be better to use a simple messaging send/receive API instead of RPC?
M. On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Slava, > > Indeed, the intent of making a C/C++ API is so virtually any > language binding will be possible, removing any practical > restrictions on client side integration options. > > Of course Hadoop RPC, therefore tight integration with Java > and Hadoop platform, will remain and I'm confident that will > continue to be improved over time by Hadoop Core. "Native" > mapreduce applications that use HBase will want to use such > Java bindings of course. > > - Andy > >> From: Slava Gorelik <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: Question on Single Connection Limitation >> To: [email protected] >> Date: Wednesday, December 24, 2008, 1:16 PM >> >> I think RPC implementation should be platform / language >> independent. IMHO.Currently i'm suffering a lot because >> of lack .NET / C++ API and if next HBase RPC will be >> language independent, this will help, so Thrift probably >> good enough, better than pure JAVA. >> >> Best Regards. > > > > >
