Yup, lets do 0.2 On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 17:23, Alan Gates <[email protected]> wrote:
> If we choose this course we can have a release candidate for 0.2 in 1-2 > days. It takes 6 days minimum to do a vote cycle on a release. So I think > we can start practicing on 0.2 very soon, release better code, and not loose > much time. > > Alan. > > On Aug 18, 2011, at 12:59 PM, Thejas Nair wrote: > > > How long is it likely to take to get 0.2 to be release ready ? I wonder > if trying to get 0.1 out will be a good exercise in getting the legal files > and other related things setup correctly ? > > Otherwise, there might be more such cycles with 0.2 as well. > > > > -Thejas > > > > > > > > On 8/18/11 11:21 AM, Alan Gates wrote: > >> If you've been following our release votes in general@incubator you > know that we have been unable to release hcat 0.1 due to issues with > formatting of legal files, missing legal files, etc. While our code for 0.1 > has remained unchanged since June we still have been unable to release it. > >> > >> In the meantime we have not stood still in terms of fixing bugs and > adding features. Rather than continuing to push two month old code I > propose we abandon 0.1 and release 0.2. We have already tagged a revision > for it. We can branch from that tag and do a release from that branch. I > believe https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HCATALOG-53 should be fixed > before we release. This has been checked in post 0.2 tag, so we will need > to port it to the branch. > >> > >> Thoughts? > >> > >> Alan. > > > >
