Ok, I'll branch shortly and we can start working on a 0.2 release. Alan.
On Aug 19, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Thejas Nair wrote: > +1 for going with 0.2 as first release. > -Thejas > > On 8/18/11 5:23 PM, Alan Gates wrote: >> If we choose this course we can have a release candidate for 0.2 in 1-2 >> days. It takes 6 days minimum to do a vote cycle on a release. So I think >> we can start practicing on 0.2 very soon, release better code, and not loose >> much time. >> >> Alan. >> >> On Aug 18, 2011, at 12:59 PM, Thejas Nair wrote: >> >>> How long is it likely to take to get 0.2 to be release ready ? I wonder if >>> trying to get 0.1 out will be a good exercise in getting the legal files >>> and other related things setup correctly ? >>> Otherwise, there might be more such cycles with 0.2 as well. >>> >>> -Thejas >>> >>> >>> >>> On 8/18/11 11:21 AM, Alan Gates wrote: >>>> If you've been following our release votes in general@incubator you know >>>> that we have been unable to release hcat 0.1 due to issues with formatting >>>> of legal files, missing legal files, etc. While our code for 0.1 has >>>> remained unchanged since June we still have been unable to release it. >>>> >>>> In the meantime we have not stood still in terms of fixing bugs and adding >>>> features. Rather than continuing to push two month old code I propose we >>>> abandon 0.1 and release 0.2. We have already tagged a revision for it. >>>> We can branch from that tag and do a release from that branch. I believe >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HCATALOG-53 should be fixed before >>>> we release. This has been checked in post 0.2 tag, so we will need to >>>> port it to the branch. >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>>> >>>> Alan. >>> >> >
