I'll try. Alan.
On Mar 21, 2012, at 2:55 AM, Giridharan Kesavan wrote: > Alan, > > If you planning for a new RC, could you pls include > "https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HCATALOG-267"; ? > > -Giri > > > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:12 PM, David Capwell <[email protected]> wrote: >> Could we also get the release in maven? HCATALOG-132 would make it easier >> for people to use hcat and integrate against hcat. >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Francis Liu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Alan, if you're rerolling a new candidate. Can we update the release notes >>> about HBaseHCatStorageHandler? >>> >>> -Francis >>> >>> On 3/20/12 5:42 PM, "Alan Gates" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> If it won't build for people I need to reroll it. HCATALOG-266 which >>>> addresses this has already been checked into the branch. I'll roll >>>> forward to this fix and build a new release candidate. >>>> >>>> Alan. >>>> >>>> On Mar 20, 2012, at 4:22 PM, Travis Crawford wrote: >>>> >>>>> I ran into the same issue as Sushanth, failing trying to >>>>> resolve hbase-0.92.1-SNAPSHOT. Maybe remove "jar-storage-handlers" as a >>>>> dependency of the "jar" target? This will likely not build for most >>>>> users >>>>> since they won't have snapshot jars available. >>>>> >>>>> For anyone who was able to build this - if you trash that jar from your >>>>> local ivy/maven repos can you still build? >>>>> >>>>> --travis >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Sushanth Sowmyan >>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In a fresh dev environment of mine, ant fails from a maven dependency >>>>>> check for hbase-0.92.1-SNAPSHOT ( linked to in >>>>>> storage-handlers/hbase/ivy/libraries.properties ). >>>>>> >>>>>> The work around for this is to simply build with a >>>>>> -Dhbase.version=0.92.1 . >>>>>> >>>>>> I realise that the hbase storage handler is still under development so >>>>>> I don't necessarily see this as a reason to reroll the package, but >>>>>> wanted to note this. What do others think? >>>>>> >>>>>> Other than that note, tests succeed, md5 works, rpm package builds and >>>>>> installs and checks on the server work. +1 from me. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Sushanth >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Ashutosh Chauhan >>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> +1 md5checksum matches. Builds fine. Ran unit tests. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Release notes mention at the top "TThese notes are for HCatalog 0.2.0 >>>>>>> release." This should be 0.4.0 release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Ashutosh >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:41, Alan Gates <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have created a candidate build for HCatalog 0.4.0-incubating. >>>>>>>> Keys >>>>>> used >>>>>>>> to sign the release are available from the KEYS file in HCatalog's >>>>>>>> SVN. >>>>>>>> Please download, test, and try it out: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~gates/hcatalog-0.4.0-incubating-candidate-0/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The release, md5 signature, gpg signature, release notes, and rat >>>>>>>> report >>>>>>>> can all be found at the above address. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Should we release this? Vote closes on Wednesday, March 21st. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Alan. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>
