On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Alan Gates <[email protected]> wrote:
> HCat does not currently produce poms. I don't have time to include adding > that before I re-roll a release. If someone can contribute the poms I'm > happy to roll that into trunk and the 0.4 branch so it will be there for > 0.4.1 and 0.5.0. > I can add POM file generation today. Have done it once before in https://github.com/kevinweil/elephant-bird/commit/ea12efa83c8a72ac8a82bdc9aae68a8da0e70e8dso this time should be pretty quick. --travis Alan. > > On Mar 20, 2012, at 7:12 PM, David Capwell wrote: > > > Could we also get the release in maven? HCATALOG-132 would make it > easier for people to use hcat and integrate against hcat. > > > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Francis Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Alan, if you're rerolling a new candidate. Can we update the release > notes > > about HBaseHCatStorageHandler? > > > > -Francis > > > > On 3/20/12 5:42 PM, "Alan Gates" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >If it won't build for people I need to reroll it. HCATALOG-266 which > > >addresses this has already been checked into the branch. I'll roll > > >forward to this fix and build a new release candidate. > > > > > >Alan. > > > > > >On Mar 20, 2012, at 4:22 PM, Travis Crawford wrote: > > > > > >> I ran into the same issue as Sushanth, failing trying to > > >> resolve hbase-0.92.1-SNAPSHOT. Maybe remove "jar-storage-handlers" as > a > > >> dependency of the "jar" target? This will likely not build for most > > >>users > > >> since they won't have snapshot jars available. > > >> > > >> For anyone who was able to build this - if you trash that jar from > your > > >> local ivy/maven repos can you still build? > > >> > > >> --travis > > >> > > >> > > >> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Sushanth Sowmyan > > >><[email protected]>wrote: > > >> > > >>> In a fresh dev environment of mine, ant fails from a maven dependency > > >>> check for hbase-0.92.1-SNAPSHOT ( linked to in > > >>> storage-handlers/hbase/ivy/libraries.properties ). > > >>> > > >>> The work around for this is to simply build with a > > >>>-Dhbase.version=0.92.1 . > > >>> > > >>> I realise that the hbase storage handler is still under development > so > > >>> I don't necessarily see this as a reason to reroll the package, but > > >>> wanted to note this. What do others think? > > >>> > > >>> Other than that note, tests succeed, md5 works, rpm package builds > and > > >>> installs and checks on the server work. +1 from me. > > >>> > > >>> -Sushanth > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Ashutosh Chauhan > > >>><[email protected]> > > >>> wrote: > > >>>> +1 md5checksum matches. Builds fine. Ran unit tests. > > >>>> > > >>>> Release notes mention at the top "TThese notes are for HCatalog > 0.2.0 > > >>>> release." This should be 0.4.0 release. > > >>>> > > >>>> Thanks, > > >>>> Ashutosh > > >>>> > > >>>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:41, Alan Gates <[email protected]> > > >>>>wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Hi, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I have created a candidate build for HCatalog 0.4.0-incubating. > Keys > > >>> used > > >>>>> to sign the release are available from the KEYS file in HCatalog's > > >>>>>SVN. > > >>>>> Please download, test, and try it out: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > http://people.apache.org/~gates/hcatalog-0.4.0-incubating-candidate-0/ > > >>>>> > > >>>>> The release, md5 signature, gpg signature, release notes, and rat > > >>>>>report > > >>>>> can all be found at the above address. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Should we release this? Vote closes on Wednesday, March 21st. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Alan. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >
