On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 06:12:37PM +0200, Davor Ocelic wrote: > Yes. The crucial problem here is that both disks are on the same controller, > as installed by InterServer staff. >
How do we know that the bottleneck is the controller? I would think that it is just as likely, or more likely, that it's caused by reading and writing on the same portion of each disk intensively. Thus it would be a disk, and not a controller bottleneck. At any rate, I have 100 GB of unused disk space on a linux box with a DSL connection -- we could set up an account for HCoop rsync and take away this disk activity immediately, perhaps resulting in a usable system that would work for at least a couple of months while we stabilize membership a bit more on fyodor. I don't see how this would take more than a few minutes to set up. Once we get rid of this bottleneck, we could probably even do a membership drive while still on fyodor... the system should rock after fixing it. I'm just throwing this out to the group as an option. :) Take care everyone, Justin _______________________________________________ HCoop-SysAdmin mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-sysadmin
