On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 20:18:11 -0600 "Christopher D. Clausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This may have been discussed before, but is anyone strongly against just > waiting for etch (the next Debian stable release) to be out before > migrating users? This should provide newer packages for nearly > everything and may save in the long run, as trying to dist-upgrade with > users on the system won't be pretty and I don't think we want to keep > running sarge for too much longer after etch is out. Yeah, I don't like this. 1st problem is time/money @ the colo facility, and the second thing is, upgrading to etch isn't that much of a big deal really. Just 2 days ago I upgraded a long-running sarge system to etch with no problems at all. > I believe I talked with docelic on IRC about creating a seperate volume > for each user's db. I'd suggest setting the initial quota to 50MB > (thats about 50000 K, which is what the AFS commands use.) There was > also aa suggestion to create and add a system:backup group with rl ACLs > to every volume, in case some sort of file-based backup system is to be > used in the future. Yes, we've added system:backup. > > Additionally, I'd suggest granting the user at least rl access to this > volume. They should be able to check the quota on the volume and it is > usally easier to simply cd into it and run fs lq than to remember to use > the vos listvol or vos examine command. Right, please add/modify what I wrote on http://wiki.hcoop.net/wiki/DaemonAdmin/MySQL to have it work this way. _______________________________________________ HCoop-SysAdmin mailing list [email protected] http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-sysadmin
