Hello Gordon,

thank you very much for your answers. Due to our resolution limited to 2 mm 
isotropic we have a substantial lower TR (3270 vs. HCP 5520 ms) and a TE of 
110.4 ms (HCP 89.50 ms). I wasn't sure if it is the one gradient direction that 
needs to be changed (since it always stopped at the same point) or something 
else (in this case using a longer TR/TE). 
Thanks to your answer, I will now gradually increase TR in a 
trial-and-error-fashion.

Any chance, the mentioned 1.5mm-DTI-TRIO-sequence can be posted here? (I guess, 
there are a couple more TRIO users in the mailing list)

Best regards,
Martin


________________________________________
Von: Xu, Junqian [[email protected]]
Gesendet: Samstag, 6. Juli 2013 16:57
An: Reiß-Zimmermann, Martin
Cc: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [HCP-Users] HCP-dMRI gradient table on a TRIO - any experience?

Martin,

Sorry that I misunderstood your problem. However It is still gradient duty 
cycle related. The Siemens VB software version doesn't estimate gradient 
heating as accurately/conservatively as the Siemens VD software version. Hence 
the minimum TE/TR allowed by the sequence can still trip the gradient duty 
cycle limit in real time, causing scan crash.

The solution is to relax the TE/TR little by little with try-and-error until 
you find a stable combination that passes your test.

Gordon

On Jul 5, 2013, at 9:12 PM, "Xu, Junqian" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Martin,
>
> The culprit is the gradient power amplifier (GPA) duty cycle too high on the 
> Y axis (i.e. the consecutive high value of 0.992 and -0.975). We have 
> encountered similar problem in HCP and have implemented a solution to solve 
> the gradient duty cycle issue.
>
> You can find the solution to this problem in Sotiropoulos et al. NeuroImage 
> special issue
>
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23702418
>
> Section: Q-space sampling
>
> "However, even when realistic sequences of diffusion gradient orientations 
> were used (even with interleaved shells), the gradient duty cycle, due to 
> accumulated heating, could still limit the achievable minimal TR. The order 
> of the diffusion gradient orientations in the final HCP dMRI protocol was 
> therefore optimised by swapping adjacent orientations to reduce the 
> auto-correlation (lag = 1) of absolute gradient amplitude (~ < 0.5) for each 
> physical gradient axis."
>
> Please let me know if this is clear enough for you to solve your specific 
> case.
>
> Regards
> Gordon
>
> On Jul 5, 2013, at 11:06 AM, "Reiß-Zimmermann, Martin" 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I tried implementing and converting the HCP dMRI-sequences for our TRIO. I 
>> followed the suggestions in the Appendix I and with minor modifications (2 
>> mm isotropic) it works well with MB3 and the MDDW-gradient table (60 
>> directions).
>>
>> However, when I use the HCP gradient table the measurement stops at 
>> reproducable stops within the sequence (see following) and always with the 
>> same error (hope I can translate that somehow from German into English):
>> Error in gradient amplifier, GPA not ready. duty cycle is to high. Please 
>> check sequence parameters.
>>
>> The sequences always stop at these points:
>>
>> 95dir-dMRI: direction number 47 (-1.000 , -0.001 , -0.011)
>> 96dir-dMRI: direction number 75 (-0.094 , 0.992 , -0.082)
>> 97dir-dMRI: direction number 55 (-0.134 , -0.975 , 0.180)
>>
>> The images before look great!
>>
>> I took a look at the page of Emmanuel Caruyer - but if I create a gradient 
>> table of 90 dir (the HCP 96dir-table seems to have 6 b0 and the rest 
>> b1000-3000, the E.C.-table seems to encode b>0 values, right?) it is totally 
>> different from the HCP one.
>>
>> I also read the note in the HCP gradient table that these gradients are 
>> customized for the Connectome-Scanner.
>>
>> So my question is: Shall I just use one created on Emmanuel's page or can I 
>> (or better: someone else) change the one from HCP?
>>
>> The Appendix I also mentions that the dMRI-sequence has been successfully 
>> tested on a TRIO and Verio with 1.5 mm isotropic resolution (and b2000). Is 
>> it possible that you could post the protocol (including the gradient table).
>>
>> Thank you very much. Best regards,
>> Martin
>> ____________________________________________________
>> Dr. med. Martin Reiss-Zimmermann
>> Abteilung für Neuroradiologie
>> Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR
>> Liebigstr. 20
>> 04103 Leipzig
>>
>> Mail: [email protected]
>> Fon:  +49 - 341 - 97 17 585
>> Fax:   +49 - 341 - 97 17 490
>> Net:   http://www.neuroradiologie-leipzig.de
>> ........................................................................................................................................................................................................
>> Universitätsklinikum Leipzig - Anstalt öffentlichen Rechts | 
>> Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Wolfram Knapp
>> Medizinischer Vorstand und Sprecher: Prof. Dr. med. Wolfgang E. Fleig | 
>> Kaufmännischer Vorstand: Dipl.-Kfm. Ekkehard Zimmer
>> Sitz: Liebigstraße 18, 04103 Leipzig | Telefon +49-341-971709 | St.Nr.: 
>> 23114904074 | IK: 261401052
>> Bankverbindung: Deutsche Bank | BLZ: 86070000 | Kto.: 1247998 | Swift-Code: 
>> DEUTDE8L | IBAN: DE27860700000124799800
>> Internet: www.uniklinikum-leipzig.de
>>
>> Universität Leipzig | Ritterstr. 26, 04109 Leipzig | Körperschaft des 
>> Öffentlichen Rechts | Vertreten durch die Rektorin Prof. Dr. Beate Schücking
>> Zuständige Aufsichtsbehörde: SMWK, Wigardstr. 17, 01097 Dresden, www.smwk.de
>> Umsatzsteuer-Identifikationsnummer gemäß §27a Umsatzsteuergesetz DE 141510383
>>
>> Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte 
>> Informationen. Sollten Sie nicht der richtige Empfänger sein oder Sie haben 
>> diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten, informieren Sie uns bitte sofort und 
>> vernichten diese E-Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte 
>> Weitergabe dieser E-Mail und der darin enthaltenen Informationen ist nicht 
>> gestattet.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> HCP-Users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HCP-Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users


_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

Reply via email to