|
For the resting state data this was addressed previously:
http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0015710
Additional discussions of the benefits of multi-band imaging appear in:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811913005065
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811913005338
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811913005053
For task fMRI, the issue is discussed some here, though there was a strong desire to use the same imaging protocol for the task fMRI and resting state fMRI:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811913005272
Is there a specific reason you are concerned about the multi-band imaging?
Of course, collecting both conventional and multi-band would have either left us with either half as much data, or it would have cost twice and much with twice as much subject burden.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Kelly Smith <[email protected]>
Date: Monday, August 5, 2013 1:16 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [HCP-Users] Why multiband data?
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail. _______________________________________________ |
- [HCP-Users] Why multiband data? Kelly Smith
- Re: [HCP-Users] Why multiband data? Glasser, Matthew
- Re: [HCP-Users] Why multiband data? Harms, Michael
