|
I wouldn’t count on that assumption at all.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Ranga Deshpande <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, October 10, 2014 at 12:07 PM To: "Harms, Michael" <[email protected]> Cc: Matt Glasser <[email protected]>, Greg Burgess <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Reg. DPARSF Dear Michael Harms,
Thanks for your reply. I know that such a question is going to arise once I do the processing and get the results, but
scanner/protocol effects must be spatially widespread and not specific. If
strong specific effects are observed then that will make an interesting result!
Regards,
Ranga
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:09 AM, Harms, Michael
<[email protected]> wrote:
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail. _______________________________________________ |
- [HCP-Users] Reg. DPARSF Ranga Deshpande
- Re: [HCP-Users] Reg. DPARSF Glasser, Matthew
- Re: [HCP-Users] Reg. DPARSF Greg Burgess
- Re: [HCP-Users] Reg. DPARSF Ranga Deshpande
- Re: [HCP-Users] Reg. DPARSF Harms, Michael
- Re: [HCP-Users] Reg. DPARSF Ranga Deshpande
- Re: [HCP-Users] Reg. DPARSF Glasser, Matthew
- Re: [HCP-Users] Reg. DPARSF Harms, Michael
- Re: [HCP-Users] Reg. DPARSF Ranga Deshpande
