Siemens "strong fat suppression” = fat sat pulse + gradient reversal

> On Jul 9, 2015, at 2:37 PM, Mark A. Pinsk <mpi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Michael
> 
> Thanks for that information, very helpful.
> 
> I forgot to mention that we haven't requested the HCP sequences at this point 
> since we have the Siemens MB sequences installed (we may end up requesting 
> them at some point).  In any case this first test protocol I created was 
> using the stock non-MB Siemens sequence.
> 
> Sounds like until we request the HCP sequence, I will use the Siemens strong 
> fat suppression, and I'll have to check what the Siemens MB diffusion 
> sequence offers for fat suppression (presumably it does not have your "grad 
> rev fat supp" option).
> 
> best
> mark
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Harms, Michael <mha...@wustl.edu> wrote:
> 
> Hi Mark,
> The locked sequences that we are using for HCP, and on which those protocol 
> print-outs are based, are based on a fairly old (at this point) version of 
> the CMRR sequences, for which Fatsat = "none" actually means that a gradient 
> reversal based method of fat suppression is used rather than RF pulses.
> 
> Subsequently at some point in the MB sequence development, this "Grad. rev. 
> fat suppr." option was explicitly added as its own variable to the UI, rather 
> than implicitly invoked by Fatsat = "none".  I assume that you will be using 
> the current version of the publicly available MB sequences (R012b), which 
> includes this "Grad. rev. fat suppr." option.
> 
> So, if you are implementing a Prisma protocol, you should also 
> cross-referencing your parameter choices against the LifeSpan protocol for 
> the 3T Prisma at CMRR, which you can find here:
> http://lifespan.humanconnectome.org/data/LSCMRR_3T_printout_2014.08.15.pdf
> 
> In that, you will see that
> Fat suppr. = None
> Grad. rev. fat suppr. = Enabled
> 
> The combination of those settings will match what is occurring "under the 
> hood" for the HCP scans (and obviously will match what we are using for the 
> LifeSpan 3T Prisma acquisitions).
> 
> Give those settings a try, and see if they eliminate your fat artifacts.
> 
> BTW: The reason that we use the gradient reversal rather than RF pulses is 
> that you get a small improvement on the SAR front.
> 
> cheers,
> -MH
> 
> -- 
> Michael Harms, Ph.D.
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> Conte Center for the Neuroscience of Mental Disorders
> Washington University School of Medicine
> Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
> 660 South Euclid Ave.  Tel: 314-747-6173
> St. Louis, MO  63110  Email: mha...@wustl.edu
> 
> From: "Mark A. Pinsk" <mpi...@gmail.com>
> Date: Thursday, July 9, 2015 12:50 PM
> To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
> Subject: [HCP-Users] fat suppression and diffusion scans
> 
> Hi 
> 
> We've set up a diffusion protocol at our Prisma following HCP recommendations 
> in Q3_Appendix_I.
> 
> I noticed that you leave fat suppression turned off, and I'm curious if 
> there's a reason for that?  
> 
> From my initial scans this morning, we get prominent fat artifacts at b=3000, 
> which seem to go away if we turn on "strong" fat suppression.   (I didn't get 
> a chance to test the other fat supp methods (weak fatsat, SPAIR, water 
> excite)).
> 
> Just wanted to check in before I leave strong fat sat turned on in our 
> protocol as a default.
> 
> thanks!
> Mark
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> HCP-Users mailing list
> HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
> 
> 
>  
> 
> The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected 
> Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are 
> not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, 
> copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this 
> information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, 
> please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> HCP-Users mailing list
> HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
> 


_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

Reply via email to