BTW:  We would encourage you to base your publication on your results from the S900 release, rather than the Q1/Q2 release.  That said, if you found that the additional smoothness in the dMRI data in the Q1/Q2 released data was beneficial in some fashion, we’d certainly be interested in hearing more.

cheers,
-MH

-- 
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Conte Center for the Neuroscience of Mental Disorders
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
660 South Euclid Ave. Tel: 314-747-6173
St. Louis, MO  63110 Email: [email protected]

From: <[email protected]> on behalf of "Harms, Michael" <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, April 7, 2016 at 9:59 AM
To: Joerg Polzehl <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Changes in unprocessed diffusion data between Q1/Q2 release and 900 subjects release


Hi,
Starting with the Q3 release, the unprocessed dMRI was “retro-reconned” from the raw k-space data using an improved image reconstruction algorithm that resulted in more “crisp” images (i.e., less spatial blurring).  So, yes, changes in SNR are completely expected.

For more details, you can see
and pages 5, 7, and 35-36 of the Q3_Release_Reference_Manual available from the preceding link.

cheers,
-MH

-- 
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Conte Center for the Neuroscience of Mental Disorders
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
660 South Euclid Ave. Tel: 314-747-6173
St. Louis, MO  63110 Email: [email protected]

From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Joerg Polzehl <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, April 7, 2016 at 9:22 AM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [HCP-Users] Changes in unprocessed diffusion data between Q1/Q2 release and 900 subjects release

Dear HCP Team Members,

      I’m in the process of revising a manuscript on statistical
modelling of DWI data. In the original version we used
the single subject unprocessed data from the Q1/Q2 Release (2013).
     For the revision we have rerun our analysis on the corresponding 
data for the same subject (subject ID 100307)  in the 900 subjects 
release (2015). Except from change in the scale of image intensities 
between both datasets (by a factor of approx. 1.5) 
we see significant changes in our analysis results, especially
the estimated SNR in the unprocessed data, that indicate qualitative
changes in data properties. 
     In my understanding, given what I can extract from the 
reference manuals and literature, the unprocessed data 
should be direct SENSE-1 reconstructions from K-space data,
i.e. the follow a Rice distribution. 

- have any data processing steps been applied after SENSE 1 reconstruction
to get the “unprocessed” data ? If yes are there differences between 
the Q1/Q2 release and the 900 subjects release ?
- did the SENSE 1 reconstruction parameters change between 
the Q1/Q2 release and the 900 subjects release ? 
- are there any other changes that can affect statistical properties, 
especially SNR in the "unprocessed” data ?

Any comments would be highly appreciated.

Best regards,

Joerg Polzehl 


  
---
Dr. Joerg Polzehl
WIAS, Mohrenstr. 39
D-10117 Berlin, Germany
email: [email protected]
Tel. +49 30/20372 481
Fax: +49 30/20372-303
Web: http://www.wias-berlin.de/people/polzehl/

_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

 


The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.

_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

 


The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.

_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

Reply via email to