Joelle et al., Other recent publication that are relevant include Power et al., 2016 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27751941) Glasser et al., 2016 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27571196) and references therein.
David > On Jan 5, 2017, at 10:00 AM, Harms, Michael <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > There are differing opinions on the appropriateness of MGTR at the present > time (pending future alternatives). You may be interested in the following > recent paper from Murphy and Fox: > https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27888059 > <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27888059> > > And, if you want to see some data on the effects of using it vs. not using it > in HCP data specifically, you can see the following paper: > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27571276 > <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27571276> > > cheers, > -MH > > -- > Michael Harms, Ph.D. > ----------------------------------------------------------- > Conte Center for the Neuroscience of Mental Disorders > Washington University School of Medicine > Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134 > 660 South Euclid Ave. Tel: 314-747-6173 > St. Louis, MO 63110 Email: [email protected] > > From: <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of "Glasser, > Matthew" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Date: Thursday, January 5, 2017 at 11:50 AM > To: Joelle Zimmermann <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>, Stephen Smith <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Cc: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] global signal regression on HCP ICA FIX denoised > BOLD? > > This is at your discretion, but we don’t typically recommend it. We are > working on a better solution for global physiological noise that doesn’t > replace a positive bias in correlations with a negative one. Another > alternative that avoids the issue is to use partial correlation. > > Peace, > > Matt. > > From: <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Joelle > Zimmermann <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Date: Thursday, January 5, 2017 at 12:47 PM > To: Stephen Smith <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Cc: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] global signal regression on HCP ICA FIX denoised > BOLD? > > Thanks Stephen. Was there GSR done on the HCP data at any point for the > non-denoised version? > > If I wanted to do GSR myself on the HCP data, are there any recommendations > that the HCP group has? Or global signal regressors that have been already > processed? Or is this something that is at the discretion of each researcher > afterwards? > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Stephen Smith <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> Yes,. >> Cheers. >> >> >>> On 5 Jan 2017, at 11:57, Joelle Zimmermann <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi HCPers, >>> >>> Is it correct that global signal regression was not done on the ICA FIX >>> denoised fmri BOLD data? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Joelle >>> _______________________________________________ >>> HCP-Users mailing list >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users >>> <http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Stephen M. Smith, Professor of Biomedical Engineering >> Head of Analysis, Oxford University FMRIB Centre >> >> FMRIB, JR Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK >> +44 (0) 1865 222726 <tel:+44%201865%20222726> (fax 222717) >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve <http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Stop the cultural destruction of Tibet <http://smithinks.net/> >> >> >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > HCP-Users mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users > <http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users> > > > The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected > Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are > not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, > copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this > information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, > please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail. > _______________________________________________ > HCP-Users mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users > <http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users> > > > The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected > Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are > not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, > copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this > information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, > please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail. > _______________________________________________ > HCP-Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users _______________________________________________ HCP-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
