I would do the second option if only to conserve space and computational burden.
Peace, Matt. From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Aaron C <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Saturday, January 14, 2017 at 12:12 PM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [HCP-Users] A question about calculating dense connectome for individual subject Dear HCP experts, I have a question about calculating dense connectome for individual subject using HCP resting-state data. Should I calculate a dense connectome for each run of the subject and then average them? Or, should I demean, variance normalize, and concatenate the four runs and then calculate a dense connectome for the subject? Thank you. _______________________________________________ HCP-Users mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users ________________________________ The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail. _______________________________________________ HCP-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
