Thanks for the detailed explanations! I have just one follow up question regarding this point:
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Timothy Coalson <tsc...@mst.edu> wrote: > > > Some techniques like hyperalignment use this "correspondence" concept > aggressively, and allow you to have discontinuities (this area is on the > "wrong" side of this other area in this subject - we have evidence that > some subjects do actually have areas shifted or split), however MSMAll > doesn't allow this (the constraints it imposes to prevent this make the > problem easier to solve, and possibly more robust to noise). When we talk > about "spherical distortion", we are talking about artifacts of this > "correspondence-finding" process, there is still no anatomical distortion > caused to individual data. > > Such splitting or shifting of areas would make comparisons with other subjects (like averaging statistics etc.) in principle problematic - also using the MMP1.0 parcellation for these subjects would be wrong for these areas. Are these subjects indicated in some way? (like having the QC_Issue codes A or B? or these problems are more subtle?) Once again many thanks, Romuald _______________________________________________ HCP-Users mailing list HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
