Right. Do you think having two sets of T1 and T2 images would significantly 
increase the amount of swapping?

Best regards,
Ruy
> On Nov 30, 2017, at 5:28 PM, Glasser, Matthew <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> That might not be enough.  If you are swapping that will increase runtime
> a lot.  
> 
> Peace,
> 
> Matt.
> 
> On 11/30/17, 4:01 PM, "Ricardo Valle" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Matt,
>> 
>> I have 16 GB of RAM. I will try running them again and let you know how
>> it goes.
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Ruy
>>> On Nov 30, 2017, at 4:57 PM, Glasser, Matthew <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> That doesnÄ…t make a lot of sense.  How much RAM do you have?
>>> PreFreeSurfer should be pretty deterministic as far as run time goes.
>>> If
>>> you try again does this persist?
>>> 
>>> Peace,
>>> 
>>> Matt.
>>> 
>>> On 11/30/17, 2:51 PM, "[email protected] on behalf
>>> of
>>> Ricardo Valle" <[email protected] on behalf of
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi all!
>>>> 
>>>> I recently ran the HCP pipeline on two HCP subjects (100307 and 103818)
>>>> and found that the time it took to run them was dramatically different.
>>>> To illustrate, Prefreesurfer took about 2 hours in one case and about
>>>> 36
>>>> hours in the other.
>>>> 
>>>> The only cause I can think of for this difference is the following: for
>>>> subject 100307, I downloaded one set of T1 (and accompanying, e.g. AFI,
>>>> BIAS, etc.) images and one set of T2 images; for subject 103818, I
>>>> downloaded both sets of T1 and both sets of T2 images. Do you think
>>>> this
>>>> might indeed be the cause of such a large running time difference? If
>>>> so,
>>>> why is this?
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> All the best,
>>>> Ruy
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> HCP-Users mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
>>> 
>> 
> 


_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

Reply via email to