You can parallelize with fewer samples and using different random numbers and then combine after the fact.
Peace, Matt. From: Xinyang Liu <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Thursday, February 1, 2018 at 5:20 AM To: Matt Glasser <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: HCP 讨论组 <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] software to do deterministic tractography Dear Matt, Thanks a lot for your suggestion. Actually, probabilistic tractography with FSL was our first choice with HCP data. However, the executing time was too long when we tried to build a global network for single subject with FSL probtrackx2, and we don't know how to run in parallel without GPU. Therefore, we wanna try the deterministic way to shorten the time. Best, Xinyang At 2018-02-01 18:51:47, "Glasser, Matthew" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: In general we recommend probabilistic tractography with FSL, but other options include MRTriX. Peace, Matt. From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Xinyang Liu <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Thursday, February 1, 2018 at 3:14 AM To: HCP 讨论组 <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [HCP-Users] software to do deterministic tractography Dear HCP experts, Could you please recommend us some software for the deterministic tractography analysis of HCP data? We are at the beginning to do that and wondering what to choose for the high-quality data. Any suggestions would be very appreciated. Thanks. Best regards, Xinyang Liu _______________________________________________ HCP-Users mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users _______________________________________________ HCP-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
