So what I take from this is that there are probably bilateral 
temporal-occipital differences that are a little bigger on the left than the 
right and that statistical thresholding is exaggerating the L/R differences.  
Assuming you had a larger sample size and the pattern stayed the same, the 
differences would be bilateral.

Matt.

From: Darko Komnenić <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Friday, August 10, 2018 at 1:18 PM
To: "Harms, Michael" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: Matt Glasser <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "Winkler, 
Anderson (NIH/NIMH) [E]" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Finding a significant difference only in one hemisphere

Hello again everyone,
I am sending the images once again, this time on an inflated surface (average 
of the entire sample). As for colors, the last time I used the third option - 
"percent" (which was default), but now I changed it to the second one - 
percentiles of the absolute value.
We had 17 patients and 25 controls (the reason for this is that we had a third 
group as well, from a different patient cohort, and there we had 25 patients, 
so we matched the number of people in the control group with that other patient 
group).
The map of the significant differences highlighted mostly occipital and 
temporal areas in the left hemisphere as more myelinated in the control sample, 
and I guess we can sort of see that in the average myelin maps as well (more 
red in the occipital areas, a lighter shade of purple in the superior temporal 
gyrus)? But, at any rate, it's not a huge effect.

I'm also including the T1 and T2 protocols in the attachment. Unfortunately, I 
was only able to get the T1 protocol in German: "ein" means "on, "aus" means 
"off"; some of the parameter names are still in English even in the T1 file, 
for those that are in German, you can see their English translation by looking 
at the same spot in the T2 file. Sorry for the inconvenience!

Looking forward to your feedback!
Best,
Darko



On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 9:13 PM, Harms, Michael 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hi,
Viewing on the inflated surface would probably be more helpful.

Also, how many subjects per group?

Cheers,
-MH

--
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Associate Professor of Psychiatry
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
660 South Euclid 
Ave<https://maps.google.com/?q=660+South+Euclid+Ave&entry=gmail&source=g>.      
                  Tel: 314-747-6173
St. Louis, MO  63110                          Email: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
From: Darko Komnenić <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 at 2:08 PM
To: "Glasser, Matthew" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: "Harms, Michael" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "Winkler, 
Anderson (NIH/NIMH) [E]" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Finding a significant difference only in one hemisphere

Thanks a lot for the clarifications everyone!
The first two images attached are average myelin maps for controls and 
patients, respectively.
The third image is what I hope to be the effect size map. I added the -saveglm 
flag to palm, and then used command -cifti-create-dense-from-template to merge 
the dpv_cohen files for left and right hemisphere. Let me know if this does not 
work.
Thanks in advance for any comments!
Best,
Darko




On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 2:22 AM, Glasser, Matthew 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
What is an effect size map?  An effect size map is in the case of a t-test of 
difference between two groups is simply the difference in the means.  A 
standardized effect size maps is a Cohen’s d, which is helpful if you want to 
compare effect sizes of different measures that are not on the same scale.  
Looking at both the difference between means and the means themselves could be 
helpful in tracking down artifacts.  Looking at maps of statistical 
significance is not helpful, despite what you see typically done in the 
neuroimaging literature.

Matt.

From: 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 on behalf of "Harms, Michael" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Tuesday, August 7, 2018 at 3:47 PM
To: "Winkler, Anderson (NIH/NIMH) [E]" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Darko Komnenić 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Finding a significant difference only in one hemisphere


A Cohen’s d map of the group difference might be helpful, but even more basic 
would be to just merge the individual myelin maps (-cifti-merge, or use 
wb_shortcuts -cifti-concatenate) and then average them (-cifti-average).

Cheers,
-MH

--
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Associate Professor of Psychiatry
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
660 South Euclid 
Ave<https://maps.google.com/?q=660+South+Euclid+Ave&entry=gmail&source=g>.      
                  Tel: 314-747-6173
St. Louis, MO  63110                          Email: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Winkler, Anderson (NIH/NIMH) [E]" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Tuesday, August 7, 2018 at 3:02 PM
To: Darko Komnenić <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "Harms, 
Michael" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Finding a significant difference only in one hemisphere

Hi Darko,

The option “-saveglm” in PALM should produce Cohen’s d maps.

All the best,

Anderson


From: Darko Komnenić <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Tuesday, August 7, 2018 at 15:25
To: "Harms, Michael" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Finding a significant difference only in one hemisphere

Hi Michael,
I don't seem to have an average myelin map as an output of the analysis. Is it 
just something I can make by merging and averaging individual myelin maps in 
workbench, or should it have been the output of the GLM analysis? Sorry for 
this most likely really basic question.
Thanks in advance!
Best,
Darko

On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 3:53 PM, Harms, Michael 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

It might be helpful to simply see the average myelin map for each group.  Do 
those look appropriate?

Cheers,
-MH

--
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Associate Professor of Psychiatry
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
660 South Euclid 
Ave<https://maps.google.com/?q=660+South+Euclid+Ave&entry=gmail&source=g>.      
                  Tel: 314-747-6173
St. Louis, MO  63110                          Email: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
From: 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 on behalf of Darko Komnenić <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Tuesday, August 7, 2018 at 6:50 AM
To: "Glasser, Matthew" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Finding a significant difference only in one hemisphere

Hi Matt,
I'm not sure what you mean by a simple effect size map. The file overlaid on 
the surfaces here is a file showing the difference between control and patient 
groups, after correction for multiple comparisons. Do I use that to make an 
effect size map, or something else?
Best,
Darko

On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 9:03 PM, Glasser, Matthew 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Can you just make a simple effect size map with + and – and no thresholding?

Matt.

From: Darko Komnenić <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Monday, August 6, 2018 at 12:09 PM

To: Matt Glasser <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Finding a significant difference only in one hemisphere

Hi Matt,
here's a screenshot of an unthresholded map.
Thanks in advance!
Best,
Darko

On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 10:12 PM, Glasser, Matthew 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Thresholded maps of statistical significance are essentially uninterpretable as 
to the existence of artifacts.  Please provide an unthresholded effect size map.

Peace,

Matt.

From: Darko Komnenić <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Friday, August 3, 2018 at 12:12 PM
To: Matt Glasser <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Finding a significant difference only in one hemisphere

Hi Matt,
here's a screenshot
Thanks in advance!
Best,
Darko

On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 10:01 PM, Glasser, Matthew 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
How about posting some pics.

Matt.

From: 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 on behalf of Darko Komnenić <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 9:16 AM
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [HCP-Users] Finding a significant difference only in one hemisphere

Dear HCP experts,
I ran an analysis comparing cortical myelination between patients and controls 
and found a significant difference between groups, but only in the left 
hemisphere. What's making me doubt my results is that the differences are 
observed in large areas of the left hemisphere, but absolutely nowhere in the 
right, and we have no theoretical reasons to expect such a lateralization.
Do you have any ideas what might have gone wrong? I have 17 patients and 25 
controls, is this maybe too small of a sample? Should I double check certain 
analysis steps? Basically any ideas are welcome, since I really cannot 
interpret these findings at all, it seems.
Thanks in advance!
Best,
Darko

_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

________________________________
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.


________________________________
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.


________________________________
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.


_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

________________________________
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.


_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

________________________________
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.

_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

________________________________
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.


________________________________
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.


________________________________
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.

_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

Reply via email to