A Friday 28 May 2010 22:54:24 Mike McGreevy escrigué: > Hi all, > > A pre-release version of HDF5 1.8.5 is available for testing, and can be > downloaded at the following link: > > ftp://ftp.hdfgroup.uiuc.edu/pub/outgoing/hdf5/hdf5-1.8.5-pre2/ > > If you have a few moments to test this, we would greatly appreciate it. > While we have tested it on the platforms that we have access to, there > are many others that we are unable to test on ourselves. Please report > any errors to [email protected], preferably within the next week or so. > We are planning to create and distribute the official release by > mid-June if no critical errors are reported beforehand.
Looks good here on Linux platform (openSUSE 64-bit). My measured performance in critical places seems okay too. By the way, I like the new performance excerpts during test time. In particular, I'm curious about this one: ============================ iopipe Test Log ============================ [clip] I/O request size is 1000000.0MB Before getrusage() call fill raw 0.00user 0.00system 0.01elapsed 8509.83MB/s fill hdf5 0.00user 0.00system 0.01elapsed 6306.27MB/s out raw 0.00user 0.03system 0.03elapsed 1425.14MB/s out hdf5 0.00user 0.03system 0.03elapsed 1350.30MB/s in raw 0.00user 0.02system 0.02elapsed 1778.29MB/s in hdf5 0.00user 0.02system 0.02elapsed 2098.98MB/s in hdf5 partial 0.01user 0.02system 0.03elapsed 1410.44MB/s 0.05user 0.28system 0:01.71elapsed 20%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 184inputs+3984outputs (2major+15920minor)pagefaults 0swaps where HDF5 seems to behave well compared with pure POSIX, except for the fill test where POSIX is significantly faster. Is this expected? -- Francesc Alted _______________________________________________ Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion. [email protected] http://mail.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_hdfgroup.org
