Hi Daniel, On Jan 31, 2011, at 8:53 PM, Daniel Dombroski wrote:
> Hi Elena, > > I'm not actually using any HL capabilities ... so what you're saying is that > in that case, they can just use --disable-hl compile flag and everything > should be ok? > Yes > That seems like really good news and a very easy fix > Please let me know if there are any problems. Elena > Thanks, > > -Dan > > > > On Jan 31, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Elena Pourmal wrote: > >> Oh, yes, sorry... >> >> Those are from the HL Fortran APIs. You will need to use --disable-hl >> configure flag to disable them. >> >> If you are using fortran HL APIs, you are out of luck for now. >> >> Elena >> On Jan 31, 2011, at 4:23 PM, Daniel Dombroski wrote: >> >>> Thanks Elena, >>> >>> My code is on a DoD Cray XE6. I contacted their tech support to see if I >>> could have them recompile, and they tried but ran into problems. I'm >>> pasting their description of the issues below. >>> >>> ########### >>> >>> Here was the initial problem description: >>> >>> Daniel, >>> I've run into a compilation problem. >>> >>> make[3]: Entering directory >>> `/work/local/usp/hdf5/1.8.5p1-i8r8/src/hdf5-1.8.5-patch1/hl/fortran/test' >>> pgf90 -fast -s -Mnoframe -I../../../fortran/src -I../../../hl/fortran/src >>> -I../../../fortran/src -I../../../hl/fortran/src -i8 -r8 -c -o tstlite.o >>> tstlite.f90 >>> PGF90-S-0155-Ambiguous interfaces for generic procedure h5ltmake_dataset_f >>> (tstlite.f90: 114) >>> PGF90-S-0155-Ambiguous interfaces for generic procedure h5ltread_dataset_f >>> (tstlite.f90: 328) >>> 0 inform, 0 warnings, 4 severes, 0 fatal for test_dataset2d >>> >>> I do not know whether I will be able to determine the cause of the problem, >>> in any case, it will take some time to understand. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Alan Scheinine, HPC Service Helpdesk, ERDC, Vicksburg >>> >>> >>> ############# >>> >>> >>> Here was a follow-up email from them: >>> >>> Daniel, >>> I cannot find any description of compiling HDF5 using "-i8 -r8" on the >>> HDF5 web site. In the distribution there is brief mention of now being able >>> to deal with "-i8 -r8" but the code does not look like it can deal with >>> that. >>> There are generic functions such as >>> >>> interface h5ltmake_dataset_f >>> module procedure h5ltmake_dataset_f_int1 >>> module procedure h5ltmake_dataset_f_int2 >>> module procedure h5ltmake_dataset_f_int3 >>> module procedure h5ltmake_dataset_f_float1 >>> module procedure h5ltmake_dataset_f_float2 >>> module procedure h5ltmake_dataset_f_float3 >>> module procedure h5ltmake_dataset_f_double1 >>> module procedure h5ltmake_dataset_f_double2 >>> module procedure h5ltmake_dataset_f_double3 >>> end interface >>> >>> but with -r8 h5ltmake_dataset_f_float1 and h5ltmake_dataset_f_double1 >>> are >>> the same. >>> >>> The release_doc/HISTORY-1_8.txt says that for the F90 API >>> Bug Fixes since HDF5-1.8.1 >>> - Put the DOUBLE PRECISION interfaces in a separate module and >>> added a USE statement for the module. The interfaces are >>> included/excluded depending on the state of FORTRAN_DEFAULT_REAL >>> is DBLE_F which detects if the default REAL is DOUBLE PRECISION. >>> This allows the library to be compiled with -r8 Fortran flag >>> without the user needing to edit the source code. >>> (MSB - 200/8/27) >>> The date above should be 2008/ rather than 200/ . >>> >>> However, the h5ltmake_dataset_f module shown above is taken directly from >>> the >>> code. It would appear that the bug fix by "MSB" neglected H5LT. In the >>> entire history file for version 1.8 "-i8" is mentioned only once and "-r8" >>> is >>> mentioned only once. I'm inclined to believe that module h5lt is not >>> compatible with -r8. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Alan Scheinine, HPC Service Helpdesk, ERDC, Vicksburg, MS >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jan 31, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Elena Pourmal wrote: >>> >>>> Daniel, >>>> >>>> You will need to recompile HDF5 library using those flags, e.g., >>>> >>>> export FC="gfortran -i8" >>>> ./configure --enable-fortran .... >>>> make >>>> >>>> When we release the version that supports Fortran2003, recompilation would >>>> not be needed. Please let me know if you are interested to try our >>>> pre-released version. >>>> >>>> Thank you! >>>> >>>> Elena >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jan 30, 2011, at 11:56 PM, Daniel Dombroski wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> >>>>> I have a fortran code which I would like to compile with the 64 bit real >>>>> and integer (-r8 and -i8) flags. However, I run into the problem of kind >>>>> mismatches with the calls to hdf5 routines which do not like double >>>>> precision. Is there a way to get hdf5 to handle the higher precision >>>>> values? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> -Dan >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion. >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://mail.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_hdfgroup.org >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion. >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://mail.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_hdfgroup.org >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion. >>> [email protected] >>> http://mail.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_hdfgroup.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion. >> [email protected] >> http://mail.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_hdfgroup.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion. > [email protected] > http://mail.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_hdfgroup.org _______________________________________________ Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion. [email protected] http://mail.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_hdfgroup.org
