Having the naming convention that we use helps manage emails better due to subject lines including "HDFS Federation". As far as tagging is concerned, all federation jiras are subtasks of HDFS-1052. Hence some kind of grouping can be done based on that.
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: > JIRA has this nice feature called 'Tag'. We've been using this for > Herriot development - seems much cleaner than clogging synopses field > with additional wodking. > -- > Take care, > Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > > > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 14:53, Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > Hey folks, > > > > Would those of you working on a branch mind adopting a naming convention > for > > all the federation tickets? I'm really glad to see all the changes going > > upstream but it's getting confusing to separate out what are bugs that > apply > > to trunk vs bugs that are just due to the federation branch being in > flux. > > > > Perhaps a "Federation: " prefix for all the JIRA titles? > > > > I'm happy to go through and edit the ones that are already up. > > > > If I'm the only one that finds these confusing, feel free to tell me to > > shove off and just deal with it :) > > > > -Todd > > -- > > Todd Lipcon > > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > -- Regards, Suresh
