On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:47 PM, suresh srinivas <srini30...@gmail.com> wrote: > Having the naming convention that we use helps manage emails better due to > subject lines including "HDFS Federation". As far as tagging is concerned, > all federation jiras are subtasks of HDFS-1052. Hence some kind of grouping > can be done based on that.
Agreed. the fix version has also been Federation Branch which supports searching. -Todd > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: > >> JIRA has this nice feature called 'Tag'. We've been using this for >> Herriot development - seems much cleaner than clogging synopses field >> with additional wodking. >> -- >> Take care, >> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >> >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 14:53, Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> wrote: >> > Hey folks, >> > >> > Would those of you working on a branch mind adopting a naming convention >> for >> > all the federation tickets? I'm really glad to see all the changes going >> > upstream but it's getting confusing to separate out what are bugs that >> apply >> > to trunk vs bugs that are just due to the federation branch being in >> flux. >> > >> > Perhaps a "Federation: " prefix for all the JIRA titles? >> > >> > I'm happy to go through and edit the ones that are already up. >> > >> > If I'm the only one that finds these confusing, feel free to tell me to >> > shove off and just deal with it :) >> > >> > -Todd >> > -- >> > Todd Lipcon >> > Software Engineer, Cloudera >> > >> > > > > -- > Regards, > Suresh > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera
