+1(non-binding)
On 3/21/18, 10:13 AM, "Jitendra Pandey" <[email protected]> wrote:
+1 (binding)
On 3/20/18, 8:39 PM, "Weiwei Yang" <[email protected]> wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
I really like this proposal and thanks for all the discussions.
--
Weiwei
On 21 Mar 2018, 8:39 AM +0800, Arpit Agarwal
<[email protected]>, wrote:
+1 (binding)
Arpit
On 3/20/18, 11:21 AM, "Owen O'Malley" <[email protected]> wrote:
All,
Following our discussions on the previous thread (Merging branch
HDFS-7240
to trunk), I'd like to propose the following:
* HDSL become a subproject of Hadoop.
* HDSL will release separately from Hadoop. Hadoop releases will not
contain HDSL and vice versa.
* HDSL will get its own jira instance so that the release tags stay
separate.
* On trunk (as opposed to release branches) HDSL will be a separate
module
in Hadoop's source tree. This will enable the HDSL to work on their
trunk
and the Hadoop trunk without making releases for every change.
* Hadoop's trunk will only build HDSL if a non-default profile is
enabled.
* When Hadoop creates a release branch, the RM will delete the HDSL
module
from the branch.
* HDSL will have their own Yetus checks and won't cause failures in the
Hadoop patch check.
I think this accomplishes most of the goals of encouraging HDSL
development
while minimizing the potential for disruption of HDFS development.
The vote will run the standard 7 days and requires a lazy 2/3 vote. PMC
votes are binding, but everyone is encouraged to vote.
+1 (binding)
.. Owen
Т���������������������������������������������������������������������ХF�V�7V'67&�&R�R���â�Fg2�FWb�V�7V'67&�&T�F���6�R��&pФf�"FF�F����6����G2�R���â�Fg2�FWbֆV��F���6�R��&pР
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
