+1. Given massive improvements in performance and stability, ozone is ready
for beta.

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 1:04 PM Salvatore LaMendola (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD A) <
slamendo...@bloomberg.net> wrote:

> +1 on moving to beta. This move makes sense to me.
>
> I've tested each point release so far in 0.4, including building several
> master snapshots along the way, and I agree with what Anu is saying below
> with regard to Ozone's stability having improved beyond "alpha" state.
>
>
> From: aengin...@apache.org At: 02/19/20 15:17:38To:
> ozone-...@hadoop.apache.org,  hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: [Discuss] Ozone moving to Beta tag
>
> Hi All,
>
>
> I would like to propose moving Ozone from 'Alpha' tags to 'Beta' tags when
> we do future releases. Here are a couple of reasons why I think we should
> make this move.
>
>
>    1. Ozone Manager or the Namenode for Ozone scales to more than 1 billion
>    keys. We tested this in our labs in an organic fashion; that is, we were
>    able to create more than 1 billion keys from external clients with no
> loss
>    in performance.
>    2. The ozone Manager meets the performance and resource constraints that
>    we set out to achieve. We were able to sustain the same throughput at
> Ozone
>    manager for over three days that took us to get this 1 billion keys.
> That
>    is, we did not have to shut down or resize memory for the namenode as we
>    went through this exercise.
>    3.  The most critical, we did this experiment with 64GB of memory
>    allocation in JVM and 64 GB of RAM off-heap allocation. That is, the
> Ozone
>    Manager was able to achieve this scale with far less memory footprint
> than
>    HDFS.
>    4. Ozone's performance is at par with HDFS when running workloads like
>    Hive (
>
>
> https://blog.cloudera.com/benchmarking-ozone-clouderas-next-generation-storage-f
> or-cdp/
> <https://blog.cloudera.com/benchmarking-ozone-clouderas-next-generation-storage-for-cdp/>
>    )
>    5. We have been able to run long-running clusters with Ozone.
>
>
> Having achieved these goals, I propose that we move from the planned
> 0.4.2-Alpha release to 0.5.0-Beta as our next release. If we hear no
> concerns about this, we would like to move Ozone from Alpha to Beta
> releases.
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Anu
>
>
> P.S. I am CC-ing HDFS dev since many people who are interested in Ozone
> still have not subscribed to Ozone dev lists. My apologies if it feels like
> spam, I promise that over time we will become less noisy in the HDFS
> channel.
>
>
> PPS. I know lots of you will want to know more specifics; Our blog presses
> are working overtime and I promise you that you will get to see all the
> details pretty soon.
>
>
>

Reply via email to