+1 for beta given major improvements.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 4:17 PM Jitendra Pandey <jnpan...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1. Given massive improvements in performance and stability, ozone is ready > for beta. > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 1:04 PM Salvatore LaMendola (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD A) > < > slamendo...@bloomberg.net> wrote: > > > +1 on moving to beta. This move makes sense to me. > > > > I've tested each point release so far in 0.4, including building several > > master snapshots along the way, and I agree with what Anu is saying below > > with regard to Ozone's stability having improved beyond "alpha" state. > > > > > > From: aengin...@apache.org At: 02/19/20 15:17:38To: > > ozone-...@hadoop.apache.org, hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org > > Subject: [Discuss] Ozone moving to Beta tag > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I would like to propose moving Ozone from 'Alpha' tags to 'Beta' tags > when > > we do future releases. Here are a couple of reasons why I think we should > > make this move. > > > > > > 1. Ozone Manager or the Namenode for Ozone scales to more than 1 > billion > > keys. We tested this in our labs in an organic fashion; that is, we > were > > able to create more than 1 billion keys from external clients with no > > loss > > in performance. > > 2. The ozone Manager meets the performance and resource constraints > that > > we set out to achieve. We were able to sustain the same throughput at > > Ozone > > manager for over three days that took us to get this 1 billion keys. > > That > > is, we did not have to shut down or resize memory for the namenode as > we > > went through this exercise. > > 3. The most critical, we did this experiment with 64GB of memory > > allocation in JVM and 64 GB of RAM off-heap allocation. That is, the > > Ozone > > Manager was able to achieve this scale with far less memory footprint > > than > > HDFS. > > 4. Ozone's performance is at par with HDFS when running workloads like > > Hive ( > > > > > > > https://blog.cloudera.com/benchmarking-ozone-clouderas-next-generation-storage-f > > or-cdp/ > > < > https://blog.cloudera.com/benchmarking-ozone-clouderas-next-generation-storage-for-cdp/ > > > > ) > > 5. We have been able to run long-running clusters with Ozone. > > > > > > Having achieved these goals, I propose that we move from the planned > > 0.4.2-Alpha release to 0.5.0-Beta as our next release. If we hear no > > concerns about this, we would like to move Ozone from Alpha to Beta > > releases. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Anu > > > > > > P.S. I am CC-ing HDFS dev since many people who are interested in Ozone > > still have not subscribed to Ozone dev lists. My apologies if it feels > like > > spam, I promise that over time we will become less noisy in the HDFS > > channel. > > > > > > PPS. I know lots of you will want to know more specifics; Our blog > presses > > are working overtime and I promise you that you will get to see all the > > details pretty soon. > > > > > > >
