[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14341170#comment-14341170
 ] 

Zhe Zhang commented on HDFS-7837:
---------------------------------

Great work Jing! I haven't finished reviewing the entire patch but below is 
what I have now:
# I updated title of HDFS-7339 to reflect the adjusted scope. 
# Should we use {{BlockInfo#isStriped}} to replace instanceof calls in all 
places?
# {{BlocksMap#removeBlock}}: why should we use capacity instead of numNodes for 
striped blocks?

> Erasure Coding: allocate and persist striped blocks in NameNode
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-7837
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7837
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Jing Zhao
>            Assignee: Jing Zhao
>         Attachments: HDFS-7837.000.patch
>
>
> Try to finish the remaining work from HDFS-7339 (except the 
> ClientProtocol/DFSClient part):
> # Allow FSNamesystem#getAdditionalBlock to create striped blocks and persist 
> striped blocks to editlog
> # Update FSImage for max allocated striped block ID
> # Update the block commit/complete logic in BlockManager



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to