[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15153787#comment-15153787
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9395:
---------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 26s 
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 7m 
40s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 40s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_72 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 41s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 
24s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m 51s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
14s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m 
56s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m 6s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.8.0_72 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m 46s 
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m 
44s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 36s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_72 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 36s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 38s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 38s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 
21s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m 49s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
11s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} Patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m 5s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m 4s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_72 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m 42s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 76m 14s {color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed with JDK v1.8.0_72. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 80m 16s {color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed with JDK v1.7.0_95. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m 
51s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 183m 43s {color} 
| {color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| JDK v1.8.0_72 Failed junit tests | 
hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestAuditLogger |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.snapshot.TestOpenFilesWithSnapshot |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestAuditLoggerWithCommands |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestSafeModeWithStripedFile |
| JDK v1.8.0_72 Timed out junit tests | 
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.TestLeaseRecovery2 |
| JDK v1.7.0_95 Failed junit tests | 
hadoop.hdfs.server.blockmanagement.TestBlockManager |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestAuditLogger |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.ha.TestHAAppend |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestAuditLoggerWithCommands |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.shortcircuit.TestShortCircuitCache |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.snapshot.TestSnapshotFileLength |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker |  Image:yetus/hadoop:0ca8df7 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12788601/HDFS-9395.006.patch |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-9395 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  mvnsite  
unit  findbugs  checkstyle  |
| uname | Linux 4bf5ca125dba 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed 
Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh 
|
| git revision | trunk / 748b6c0 |
| Default Java | 1.7.0_95 |
| Multi-JDK versions |  /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-oracle:1.8.0_72 
/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64:1.7.0_95 |
| findbugs | v3.0.0 |
| unit | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/14542/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-jdk1.8.0_72.txt
 |
| unit | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/14542/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-jdk1.7.0_95.txt
 |
| unit test logs |  
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/14542/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-jdk1.8.0_72.txt
 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/14542/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-jdk1.7.0_95.txt
 |
| JDK v1.7.0_95  Test Results | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/14542/testReport/ |
| modules | C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs U: 
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/14542/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.2.0-SNAPSHOT   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> Make HDFS audit logging consistant
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-9395
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9395
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Kihwal Lee
>            Assignee: Kuhu Shukla
>         Attachments: HDFS-9395.001.patch, HDFS-9395.002.patch, 
> HDFS-9395.003.patch, HDFS-9395.004.patch, HDFS-9395.005.patch, 
> HDFS-9395.006.patch
>
>
> So, the big question here is what should go in the audit log? All failures, 
> or just "permission denied" failures? Or, to put it a different way, if 
> someone attempts to do something and it fails because a file doesn't exist, 
> is that worth an audit log entry?
> We are currently inconsistent on this point. For example, concat, 
> getContentSummary, addCacheDirective, and setErasureEncodingPolicy create an 
> audit log entry for all failures, but setOwner, delete, and setAclEntries 
> attempt to only create an entry for AccessControlException-based failures. 
> There are a few operations, like allowSnapshot, disallowSnapshot, and 
> startRollingUpgrade that never create audit log failure entries at all. They 
> simply log nothing for any failure, and log success for a successful 
> operation.
> So to summarize, different HDFS operations currently fall into 3 categories:
> 1. audit-log all failures
> 2. audit-log only AccessControlException failures
> 3. never audit-log failures
> Which category is right?  And how can we fix the inconsistency



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to