[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15211010#comment-15211010
]
Arpit Agarwal commented on HDFS-9847:
-------------------------------------
Should we just keep the defaults as they are to keep the patch size sane? I'd
be +1 on HDFS-9847-nothrow.001.patch for trunk but still think we should
eliminate the warning for branch-2 to avoid overwhelming admins with benign
warnings (attached a [proposed branch-2 patch
here|https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12795307/HDFS-9847-branch-2.002.patch]).
We could revisit the defaults in another Jira.
> HDFS configuration without time unit name should accept friendly time units
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-9847
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9847
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Affects Versions: 2.7.1
> Reporter: Lin Yiqun
> Assignee: Lin Yiqun
> Attachments: HDFS-9847-branch-2.001.patch,
> HDFS-9847-branch-2.002.patch, HDFS-9847-nothrow.001.patch,
> HDFS-9847-nothrow.002.patch, HDFS-9847.001.patch, HDFS-9847.002.patch,
> HDFS-9847.003.patch, HDFS-9847.004.patch, HDFS-9847.005.patch,
> HDFS-9847.006.patch, branch-2-delta.002.txt, timeduration-w-y.patch
>
>
> In HDFS-9821, it talks about the issue of leting existing keys use friendly
> units e.g. 60s, 5m, 1d, 6w etc. But there are som configuration key names
> contain time unit name, like {{dfs.blockreport.intervalMsec}}, so we can make
> some other configurations which without time unit name to accept friendly
> time units. The time unit {{seconds}} is frequently used in hdfs. We can
> updating this configurations first.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
