[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15966871#comment-15966871
]
Manoj Govindassamy commented on HDFS-11644:
-------------------------------------------
[~andrew.wang], [[email protected]],
IMHO, instead of assuming all Syncable implementations supporting
hflush()/hsync(), we can have the interface additionally expose isSyncable() or
similar which can be queried to find whether the stream supports
hflush()/hsync() or not. And, maybe we should have uniform implementation for
hsync/hflush that either fall back or throw exception.
> DFSStripedOutputStream should not implement Syncable
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-11644
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11644
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: erasure-coding
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha1
> Reporter: Andrew Wang
> Assignee: Manoj Govindassamy
> Labels: hdfs-ec-3.0-must-do
>
> FSDataOutputStream#hsync checks if a stream implements Syncable, and if so,
> calls hsync. Otherwise, it just calls flush. This is used, for instance, by
> YARN's FileSystemTimelineWriter.
> DFSStripedOutputStream extends DFSOutputStream, which implements Syncable.
> However, DFSStripedOS throws a runtime exception when the Syncable methods
> are called.
> We should refactor the inheritance structure so DFSStripedOS does not
> implement Syncable.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
