[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053521#comment-13053521
 ] 

Aaron T. Myers commented on HDFS-1900:
--------------------------------------

Thanks a lot for checking on that, Abel. That seems fine to change.

The patch application failed with the following error "Looks like this is a 
cross-subproject patch. Not supported!"

This happened because this change affects both the Common and HDFS subprojects. 
Unfortunately, the QA bot can't presently handle this, so you'll need to run 
test-patch yourself and paste the output here as a comment.

Sorry about that. :/

> Use the block size key defined by common 
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-1900
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1900
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.21.1
>            Reporter: Eli Collins
>            Assignee: Abel Perez
>              Labels: newbie
>             Fix For: 0.22.0
>
>         Attachments: HDFS-1900.txt
>
>
> HADOOP-4952 added a dfs.block.size key to common configuration, defined in 
> o.a.h.fs.FsConfig. This conflicts with the original HDFS block size key of 
> the same name, which is now deprecated in favor of dfs.blocksize. It doesn't 
> make sense to have two different keys for the block size (ie they can 
> disagree). Why doesn't HDFS just use the key defined in common?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to