[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13068702#comment-13068702
]
Todd Lipcon commented on HDFS-2179:
-----------------------------------
and one more open question I forgot: do we care about _read_ fencing? ie, is it
OK if the old NN can for some number of seconds service reads which are no
longer up-to-date? If so, storage fencing is necessary but not sufficient.
> HA: namenode fencing mechanism
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-2179
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2179
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: name-node
> Reporter: Todd Lipcon
> Assignee: Todd Lipcon
>
> In an HA cluster, when there are two NNs, the invariant that only one NN is
> active at a time has to be preserved in order to prevent "split brain
> syndrome." Thus, when a standby NN is transition to "active" state during a
> failover, it needs to somehow _fence_ the formerly active NN to ensure that
> it can no longer perform edits. This JIRA is to discuss and implement NN
> fencing.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
