[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13746?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16581343#comment-16581343
 ] 

Daniel Templeton commented on HDFS-13746:
-----------------------------------------

Thanks, [~smeng], the patch looks great.  One question:

{code}Math.toIntExact(groupRefreshTimeoutSec) * 1000 * 30{code}

Should that be

{code}Math.toIntExact(groupRefreshTimeoutSec * 1000) * 30{code}

or maybe even

{code}Math.toIntExact(groupRefreshTimeoutSec * 1000 * 30}

?

If you're going to proactively check for int overflows, it seems like you'd 
want to do it for the final product rather than a factor.  Thoughts?

> Still occasional "Should be different group" failure in 
> TestRefreshUserMappings#testGroupMappingRefresh
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-13746
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13746
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>            Reporter: Siyao Meng
>            Assignee: Siyao Meng
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HDFS-13746.001.patch, HDFS-13746.002.patch, 
> HDFS-13746.003.patch, HDFS-13746.004.patch, HDFS-13746.005.patch
>
>
> In https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13723, increasing the amount of 
> time in sleep() helps but the problem still appears, which is annoying.
>  
> Solution:
> Use a loop to allow the test case to fail maxTrials times before declaring 
> failure. Wait 50 ms between each retry.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to