[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-447?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16621261#comment-16621261
]
Elek, Marton commented on HDDS-447:
-----------------------------------
Yes. Good questions.
1. I removed the hdds specific part from the hadoop-dist project only. The hdds
profile still exists in the main pom.xml. I created a new dist project
(hadoop-ozone/dist) just for the ozone. To get the artifact use -Phdds and
check the result in hadoop-ozone/dist/target/ozone-0.3.0-SNAPSHOT (The
structure/content is same as before).
2. The webapp part is more tricky. The current HttpServer2 reads the css/html
resources from the classpath. The old/hadoop-dist style distribution assembly
copies the webapp folder to the share/hadoop/... and adds it to the hadoop
classpath. Now we can do it in a more simple way. With adding the webapp
folders to the jar file (with moving it to the resource folder) we don't need
copy the css/html part any more as it will be on the classpath automatically.
And as we have exact classpath definition the right webapp folder will be on
the classpath for the each services.
> separate ozone-dist and hadoop-dist projects with real classpath separation
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDDS-447
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-447
> Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Elek, Marton
> Assignee: Elek, Marton
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: HDDS-447-ozone-0.2.001.patch, HDDS-447.003.patch
>
>
> Currently we have the same hadoop-dist project to create both the ozone and
> and the hadoop distribution.
> To decouple ozone and hadoop build it would be great to create two different
> dist project.
> The hadoop-dist should be cloned to hadoop-ozone/dist and from
> hadoop-dist/pom.xml we can remove the hdds/ozone related items and from
> hadoop-ozone/dist/pom.xml we can remove the core hadoop related part.
> An other issue with the current distribution schema is the lack of real
> classpath separation.
> The current hadoop distribution model is defined in the hadoop-project-dist
> which is parent of all the component projects and the output of the
> distribution generation will be copied by the dist-layout-stitching. There is
> no easy way to use command specific classpath as the classpath is defined in
> component level (hdfs/yarn/mapreduce).
> With this approach we will have a lot of unnecessary dependencies on the
> classpath (which were not on the classpath at the time of the unit tests) and
> it's not possible (as an example) use different type of jaxrs stack for
> different services (s3gateway vs scm).
> As a simplified but more effective approach I propose to use the following
> method:
> 1. don't use hadoop-project-dist for ozone projects any more
> 2. During the build generate a classpath descriptor (with the
> dependency:build-classpath maven plugin/goal) for all the projects
> 3. During the distribution copy all the required dependencies (with
> dependency:copy maven plugin/goal) to a lib folder (share/ozone/lib)
> 4. During the distribution copy all the classpath descriptors to the
> classpath folder (share/ozone/classpath)
> 5. Put only the required jar files to the classpath with reading the
> classpath descriptor
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
