[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16856256#comment-16856256
 ] 

Ayush Saxena commented on HDFS-14545:
-------------------------------------

Mine is just a draft, Well I felt we should get from namenode just because 
Router is supposed to just take request from client and forward to namenode and 
return the response that namenode return, if client directly talked to it. Well 
if router can answer too, that is also fine. If there is no scenario where 
Router response shall differ from the namenodes. We may just keep the one you 
proposed too. It shall save the cost of communicating. You can go ahead with 
the work here [~elgoiri]. :)

> RBF: Router should support GetUserMappingsProtocol
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-14545
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14545
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Íñigo Goiri
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HDFS-14545-HDFS-13891-01.patch, 
> HDFS-14545-HDFS-13891.000.patch
>
>
> We should be able to check the groups for a user from a Router.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to