[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16877980#comment-16877980
]
Anu Engineer commented on HDDS-1661:
------------------------------------
{quote}I think this is an odd behavior for open source development. I respect
your reasons to keep the status quote, but it is awful for people who like to
contribute, but can't.
{quote}
As usual, you go on a tangent again. A Complete mischaracterization of Ozone.
We have 1700 JIRAs under HDDS project. We have almost a 600 under HDFS-7240; so
you think that these 2300 JIRAs out there do not represent open development and
community involvement?. You come to every week community call; you are present;
you know who deeply we discuss each issue; including listening to you; yet you
think we are "awful for people who like to contribute". Seriously?
Let me tell you how I see it from my perspective. You will file a Jira and
insist that it has to be done in a specific way. For example, this JIRA; We are
saying that we did this separation of Ozone and HDDS specifically since the
community voted to do so, and asked us to merge them as different projects.
They even asked us to rename HDSL to HDDS. So the community was more focused on
HDDS. They want us to prove that HDDS can be a viable substrate for HDFS.
We told you the historical origins of why we separated out HDDS(there is a
400KB patch with 6 committers name on that separation, We worked around the
clock and over a video link that ran for more than 3 days to make that happen);
but you want to go back, and I am of the opinion that the community asked us to
prove that HDDS is a viable substrate once; let us do that with Ozone GA and
then come back with proof of what we have.
Ok, At that point of technical discussion, you start attacking us – saying this
like "we are brainwashing people", now you accuse us of not allowing you to
contribute. It is very difficult to have a technical discussion with you. From
the moment you hear a dissenting technical opinion; you start resorting to
personal attacks. In fact, your technical argument disappears completely.
Then you will comment about something that is not related to the original
question; I am going to wait for something like
findbugs/checkstyle/docker/shell script. Something irrelevant to this
discussion, along with a healthy dose of insulting verbiage.
Which will trigger a long reply from me ..and the cycle continues ...
Eric, This is NOT a productive way for community development. If you like I
can summarize my interactions with you Jira by Jira, and all of them always
devolve to this pattern. I am writing this down with the hope that perhaps you
don't realize what is happening, and this will help you to become a more
effective contributor.
> Consolidate hadoop-hdds and hadoop-ozone into hadoop-ozone-project
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDDS-1661
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1661
> Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Eric Yang
> Priority: Major
>
> Ozone source code is some what fragmented in Hadoop source code. The current
> code looks like:
> {code}
> hadoop/pom.ozone.xml
> ├── hadoop-hdds
> └── hadoop-ozone
> {code}
> It is helpful to consolidate the project into high level grouping such as:
> {code}
> hadoop
> └── hadoop-ozone-project/pom.xml
> └── hadoop-ozone-project/hadoop-hdds
> └── hadoop-ozone-project/hadoop-ozone
> {code}
> This allows user to build ozone from hadoop-ozone-project directory.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
