[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17079525#comment-17079525
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-15255:
----------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  1m 
43s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  1m  
8s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 24m 
21s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 20m 
37s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  3m 
19s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  5m 
16s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
27m 17s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 10m 
44s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  3m 
13s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
20s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  3m 
 1s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 15m 
19s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 15m 
19s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}  
2m 43s{color} | {color:orange} root: The patch generated 1 new + 590 unchanged 
- 0 fixed = 591 total (was 590) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  4m  
1s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green}  0m  
1s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
14m 26s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red}  3m  
8s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs generated 1 new + 0 
unchanged - 0 fixed = 1 total (was 0) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m 
50s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  8m 
57s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}  2m  1s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs-client in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}101m 43s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}  7m 51s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs-rbf in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
49s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}265m 42s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| FindBugs | module:hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs |
|  |  Call to 
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.protocol.DatanodeInfoWithStorage.equals(org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.blockmanagement.DatanodeDescriptor)
 in 
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.CacheManager.setCachedLocations(LocatedBlock)
  At CacheManager.java: At CacheManager.java:[line 956] |
| Failed junit tests | 
hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.ha.TestConfiguredFailoverProxyProvider |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestBPOfferService |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestRollingUpgrade |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.federation.router.TestRouterRpcMultiDestination |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=19.03.8 Server=19.03.8 Image:yetus/hadoop:e6455cc864d |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-15255 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12999429/HDFS-15255.004.patch |
| Optional Tests |  dupname  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  
mvnsite  unit  shadedclient  findbugs  checkstyle  xml  |
| uname | Linux a7507223e60e 4.15.0-74-generic #84-Ubuntu SMP Thu Dec 19 
08:06:28 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | trunk / e2c87b7 |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_242 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| checkstyle | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/29098/artifact/out/diff-checkstyle-root.txt
 |
| findbugs | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/29098/artifact/out/new-findbugs-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.html
 |
| unit | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/29098/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-client.txt
 |
| unit | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/29098/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt
 |
| unit | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/29098/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-rbf.txt
 |
|  Test Results | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/29098/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 3377 (vs. ulimit of 5500) |
| modules | C: hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common 
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-client hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs 
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-rbf U: . |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/29098/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> Consider StorageType when DatanodeManager#sortLocatedBlock()
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-15255
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15255
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Lisheng Sun
>            Assignee: Lisheng Sun
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HDFS-15255.001.patch, HDFS-15255.002.patch, 
> HDFS-15255.003.patch, HDFS-15255.004.patch
>
>
> When only one replica of a block is SDD, the others are HDD. 
> When the client reads the data, the current logic is that it considers the 
> distance between the client and the dn. I think it should also consider the 
> StorageType of the replica. Priority to return a replica of the specified 
> StorageType



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to