[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17076380#comment-17076380
 ] 

Stephen O'Donnell commented on HDFS-15255:
------------------------------------------

{quote}
If both are set, then the comparator here would return both.
Since in follow code, when call Collections.sort(list, comp), list has been 
sorted.
{quote}

I'm not sure if that is correct. This method does not actually do the sorting. 
Rather it returns a `Consumer<>` object which seems to contain a comparator. 
This is then passed to `networktopology.sortByDistance` where the actual sort 
is applied.

Reading this method, I think it returns only one "sort". It starts as a 
shuffle. If `readConsiderLoad` is set, it overwrites it. If 
`readConsiderStorageType` is also set, it overwrites it again and the last one 
set wins and is returned. I don't think each sort is applied on top of the last.

In saying the above, this syntax is a bit unfamiliar to me, so I may be wrong!

> Consider StorageType when DatanodeManager#sortLocatedBlock()
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-15255
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15255
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Lisheng Sun
>            Assignee: Lisheng Sun
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HDFS-15255.001.patch, HDFS-15255.002.patch
>
>
> When only one replica of a block is SDD, the others are HDD. 
> When the client reads the data, the current logic is that it considers the 
> distance between the client and the dn. I think it should also consider the 
> StorageType of the replica. Priority to return a replica of the specified 
> StorageType



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to