[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17807938#comment-17807938
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on HDFS-17341:
---------------------------------------

li-leyang opened a new pull request, #6461:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6461

   <!--
     Thanks for sending a pull request!
       1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/How+To+Contribute
       2. Make sure your PR title starts with JIRA issue id, e.g., 
'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...'.
   -->
   
   ### Description of PR
   
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   
   
   ### For code changes:
   
   - [ ] Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id 
(e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
   - [ ] Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the 
endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
   - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)?
   - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the `LICENSE`, `LICENSE-binary`, 
`NOTICE-binary` files?
   
   




> Support dedicated user queues in Namenode FairCallQueue
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-17341
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17341
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: namenode
>    Affects Versions: 2.10.0, 3.4.0
>            Reporter: Lei Yang
>            Priority: Major
>
> Some service users today in namenode like ETL, metrics collection, ad-hoc 
> users that are critical to run business critical job accounts for many 
> traffic in namenode and shouldn't be throttled the same way as other 
> individual users in FCQ.
> There is feature in namenode to always prioritize some service users to not 
> subject to FCQ scheduling. (Those users are always p0) but it is not perfect 
> and it doesn't account for traffic surge from those users.
> The idea is to allocate dedicated rpc queues for those service users with 
> bounded queue capacity and allocate processing weight for those users. If 
> queue is full, those users are expected to backoff and retry.
>  
> New configs:
> {code:java}
> "faircallqueue.reserved.users"; // list of service users that are assigned to 
> dedicated queue
> "faircallqueue.reserved.users.max"; // max number of service users allowed
> "faircallqueue.reserved.users.capacities"; // custom queue capacities for 
> each service user
> "faircallqueue.multiplexer.reserved.weights"; // processing weights for each 
> dedicated queue{code}
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to