[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13214787#comment-13214787
]
Aaron T. Myers commented on HDFS-2990:
--------------------------------------
bq. This does not sound a good reason to move the tools to the namenode
package. Otherwise, we will end up with everything in the same package.
Hey Nicholas, do you have an alternative suggestion? Would you be OK with
changing a few things in o.a.h.hdfs.server.namenode public that otherwise
wouldn't need to be? Certainly having to copy/paste the code would be a real
shame.
> Move OfflineImageViewer, OfflineEditsViewer into the same package as the
> NameNode
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-2990
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2990
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Colin Patrick McCabe
> Assignee: Colin Patrick McCabe
> Attachments: HDFS-2990.patch
>
>
> Since OfflineImageviewer and OfflineEditsVeiwer are in different namespaces
> than the NameNode, we can't ruuse a lot of the code from the NameNode without
> making things public that we probably don't want to make public. Let's move
> them into the NameNode namespace to avoid this problem. These tools will
> always be tightly tied to the NameNode anyway (they are parsing the same
> on-disk structures, after all), so that is where they belong.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
