[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13473715#comment-13473715
]
Eli Collins commented on HDFS-4028:
-----------------------------------
Sanjay,
Per Todd and ATM's question on HDFS-3077 can you explain why this approach is
better? The only rationale I could see from the HDFS-3077 thread was copying
ZAB. ATM's comment that newEpoch and prepareRecovery are distinct operations
with distinct purposes makes sense to me as well. I'm not opposed to this
change, am just trying to understand the purpose. Re-doing some code and a
bunch of QA should IMO have some motivation beyond copying ZAB.
Thanks,
Eli
> QJM: Merge newEpoch and prepareRecovery
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-4028
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4028
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: ha, name-node
> Reporter: Sanjay Radia
> Assignee: Suresh Srinivas
> Fix For: QuorumJournalManager (HDFS-3077)
>
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
