[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14138692#comment-14138692
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-6970:
---------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12669643/hdfs-6970.001.patch
against trunk revision ee21b13.
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 1 new
or modified test files.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages.
{color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with
eclipse:eclipse.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests in
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs:
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.TestEncryptionZonesWithKMS
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.web.TestWebHdfsFileSystemContract
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.ha.TestPipelinesFailover
{color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/8074//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/8074//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Move startFile EDEK retries to the DFSClient
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-6970
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6970
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: encryption
> Affects Versions: 2.5.0
> Reporter: Andrew Wang
> Assignee: Andrew Wang
> Attachments: hdfs-6970.001.patch
>
>
> [~sureshms] pointed out that holding on to an RPC handler while talking to
> the KMS is bad, since it can exhaust the available handlers. Let's avoid this
> by doing retries at the DFSClient rather than in the RPC handler, and moving
> EDEK fetching to the background.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
