Dear list,

I've been exerimenting with Radiance's findglare and glarendx, trying
to get UGRs from photographic HDRs. I'm using the Sigma 4.5mm on a
D200, which seems to be quite a popular choice amongst you.

Unlike the FC-E8/Coolpix combo, which produces an equidistant
projection (-vta), the Sigma 4.5mm results in a 180deg equisolidangle
view. I gather from this post to the rad-gen list:
http://www.radiance-online.org/pipermail/radiance-general/2010-April/006709.html
that the NYT cart was based on a Sigma lens (4.5mm ?), operated at
F5.6. The code snippet in that post suggests that the HDRs were
vignetting corrected.

An overall calibration of the image luminance can be carried out (I
think) by measuring the vertical illuminance at the lens when the
exposure-bracketed sequence is taken, and then running findglare and
glarendx -t ver_illu on the HDR, which should give a calibration
factor that can then be used to fiddle with the EXPOSURE= line. This
is probably more accurate than calibrating against spot meter
readings. So far, so good.

What I don't seem to be able to find in the googleable literature, nor
in the HDR book, is any words of wisdom regarding the impact of the
lens projection on glare metrics. Radiance doesn't have an
equisolidangle view type, so using pinterp as detailed in this post:
http://www.radiance-online.org/pipermail/radiance-general/2011-August/008141.html
is not an option.

It might be possible to utilse ImageMagick to re-project the JPGs
prior to running hdrgen, but I'd rather not go there.

The deviation between equisolidangle and -vta is most noticeable for
high off-axis angles, which is also where glare sources have less of
an impact (Guth position index). I'm therefore wondering whether
people just tend to go with the vignetting-corrected and
luminance-calibrated HDR without worrying too much about re-projecting
the fisheye. The same question would apply to evalglare's DGP rating,
which relies on the HDR coming in -vta.  Has anybody looked into this?

Cheers

Axel

_______________________________________________
HDRI mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/hdri

Reply via email to