Thanks, Greg

Enjoy your well-deserved weekend.

Over and out.

Axel

On 3 February 2012 21:29, Gregory J. Ward <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Axel,
>
>> From: Axel Jacobs <[email protected]>
>> Date: February 3, 2012 1:21:43 PM PST
> ...
>>
>> Will do. I shall report back to this thread. One last sub-question, if I may:
>>
>>> An overall calibration of the image luminance can be carried out (I
>>> think) by measuring the vertical illuminance at the lens when the
>>> exposure-bracketed sequence is taken, and then running findglare and
>>> glarendx -t ver_illu on the HDR, which should give a calibration
>>> factor that can then be used to fiddle with the EXPOSURE= line. This
>>> is probably more accurate than calibrating against spot meter
>>> readings. So far, so good.
>>
>> Does this make sense? Is this what the NYT trolley did? Spot luminance
>> meter calibrations are a bit messy, because it's very difficult to
>> match the target circle of the luminance meter against a pixel value
>> ('L' in ximage), or against a box average
>> ('drag-your-mouse-in-ximage', then hit 'L')?
>
> Yes, but you need to do it after all the spatial corrections have been 
> applied (solid angle + vignetting).
>
>> The problem with lux meters, on the other hand, is that cosine
>> correction for near-the-horizon-angles is hopeless, even for 'proper'
>> illuminance meters. Some manufacturers will not even give you a number
>> for angles > 80deg, which is a problem almost identical to the HDR
>> projection function. Perfect alignment appears to be critical for
>> light sources close to the visible horizon of the meter, irrespective
>> of the cos weighting.
>
> I guess this doesn't surprise me.  Having the bright areas in front rather 
> than off to the side should improve things.  You may be better off using a 
> patch calibration, which is what they did at LBNL in their advance glazings 
> test facility.  I don't recall what we did on the NYT trolly as far as 
> calibration goes.
>
> Cheers,
> -Greg
> _______________________________________________
> HDRI mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/hdri

_______________________________________________
HDRI mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/hdri

Reply via email to